
Cheapest types of houses to build<\/h2>\n
When building a house<\/a> inexpensively, thinking outside that traditional box of a 2,000-square-foot, three-bedroom, two-bath home with a standard builder\u2019s package can be a potential way to reduce costs.<\/p>\n There are a lot of different housing options<\/a> available these days, and being open to different types of builds might mean big savings.<\/p>\n Tiny homes<\/a> have become incredibly popular in recent years, partly thanks to HGTV, but also because people are looking to find ways to own a home without being house-poor<\/a>. The global market for tiny homes is expected to reach $3.57 billion<\/a> by 2026, and according to a survey by HomeAdvisor<\/a>, nearly nine out of 10 people in the U.S. said they would consider tiny home living, and 68% said they would buy a tiny house as their first home.<\/p>\n While a tiny house is likely to be less expensive than a larger house, rising materials and labor costs mean they aren\u2019t necessarily the cheapest option. Prices will vary greatly based on the size and design of the tiny house you want to build, but you can estimate an average of $160 per square foot<\/a>.<\/p>\n If you want to go really tiny, like a 200-square-foot house, you might pay as little as $30,000, while a 600-square-foot tiny home could cost $100,000 or more. This also doesn\u2019t include land, which you\u2019ll need if you are building a house on a foundation, as opposed to the popular wheeled tiny homes.<\/p>\n Shipping container homes have become a popular option for people looking to build a unique house at an affordable cost.<\/p>\n The containers themselves are cheap, ranging between $1,200 to $10,000<\/a>, depending on the condition. Container homes can also be constructed fairly quickly, and you can combine them to make a full-size house.<\/p>\n Despite the low initial price tag, costs can add up quickly. You\u2019ll need to pay to have the container(s) delivered, as well as for the land you\u2019re building on, lumber and materials for the interior, and utilities such as electrical and plumbing.<\/p>\n Containers are also built to be airtight, so a ventilation system of some kind is a must.<\/p>\n Modular homes<\/a> are constructed in sections or modules; once complete, they are transported to their permanent site and assembled atop a poured foundation.<\/p>\n No longer the flimsy prefab houses of 30 years ago, today\u2019s modular homes are usually well-built and high quality, with a wide range of floor plans and styles. A modular house is often less expensive than a site-built house because construction is streamlined, and their manufacturers can buy supplies in bulk, not to mention being more energy-efficient.<\/p>\n HomeGuide<\/a> lists the cost to build a modular home as ranging from $50 to $100 per square foot, which doesn\u2019t include any of the other things required to complete the house. You\u2019ll also need a foundation, land to put that foundation on, utilities set up, and a contractor if you aren\u2019t skilled in building yourself.<\/p>\n According to a HomeLight Top Agent Insights report<\/a>, homeowners in rural areas have begun to build \u201cbarndominiums<\/a>,\u201d typically single-family structures made of metal with vaulted ceilings.<\/p>\n \u201cBarndos\u201d create living space out of the basic structure of a barn, which offers customizability. Buyers of barndominiums also tend to value the rural lifestyle, lower cost, and reduced maintenance these structures require.<\/p>\n In part thanks to the newness of the barndominium trend, these structures can be harder to finance and typically are found in more rural areas, including around Knoxville, West Georgia, Idaho, and Montana.<\/p>\n Prefab house or cabin kits, in which all the needed materials are delivered to your door, have become a popular way for DIY-ers to build without having to purchase supplies piece by piece. You might\u2019ve even seen some of these kits on Amazon<\/a>.<\/p>\n The kits include pre-cut lumber, are usually at least partially assembled, and come with instructions on how to build them. They can be customized to suit individual needs, with sizes that range from truly tiny to well over 1,000 square feet<\/a>.<\/p>\n Prices range anywhere from $100 per square foot to $250 or more, and like a modular home, those square footage costs don\u2019t include your land, foundation, or utilities \u2014 and although some companies, like prefab kit company Shelter-Kit<\/a>, say they design for amateur assembly with assistance, unless you\u2019ve got some building experience, kit houses aren\u2019t necessarily easy to put together.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section> Being your own contractor can be a great way to save when it comes to building on the cheap.<\/a> But if you don\u2019t know what you\u2019re doing, it can also end up being more expensive.<\/p>\n Mistakes in the world of construction can be costly, not to mention the extra time it takes to go back and fix errors.<\/p>\n If you\u2019ve never built a house before, hiring a contractor<\/a> might be the way to go. Or, you can still partially be your own builder by completing some of the more basic work yourself, and hiring subcontractors for specialized work, such as electrical and plumbing.<\/p>\n Going through a builder who has new construction homes for sale is also an option, and while it\u2019s not always the least expensive, it can be more streamlined than building on your own<\/a> \u2014 you\u2019ll know upfront exactly what you\u2019re getting, and won\u2019t have to worry about things like buying land<\/a> to build on and bringing utilities to your property. While there are a variety of ways to cut costs when building a house, limiting square footage remains the biggest factor. The National Association of Homebuilders<\/a> lists it as the number one way to drastically reduce construction costs.<\/p>\n If you\u2019re working as your own contractor, make sure your plans keep water-using rooms in the same area, such as putting the laundry room off the bathroom. And if you go with a builder, they sometimes offer a few different levels of upgrades, so you\u2019ll potentially be able to save some money if you stick with the standard builder\u2019s grade rather than getting that high-end marble countertop.<\/p>\n Slaughter notes that buyers interested in new construction<\/a> should understand that a lot of builders offer packages and that control over upgrades or floor plans might be more limited than you think.<\/p>\n \u201cIn our area, some of our builders have design centers where you can pick things out and do upgrades,\u201d she says, \u201cbut others have set packages that say: this is what you get, with minimal or no upgrades allowed. There aren\u2019t really ways with homes like that to get a reduction in cost.\u201d<\/p>\n Rising costs for materials have impacted new builds<\/a> as well, although in 2023, some of those costs, such as lumber<\/a>, finally stabilized after high volatility during the pandemic. Anticipated growth in housing demand, however, is forecasted to lead to an increase in lumber prices throughout 2024. If you\u2019ve been watching a lot of those home-building reality shows, you might think you can build a house for next to nothing. But the true reality is, those shows don\u2019t necessarily give an accurate depiction of how the builders saved money. People on these shows are sometimes able to get materials donated to them, or they get free labor from friends, which can affect the total cost.<\/p>\n Auburn University student housing development project Rural Studio<\/a> has been able to build homes in that $20,000 range, but for an average person, this can be incredibly difficult, as trying to control labor and materials costs is nearly impossible. However, once the house is built, if you have a smaller house, you\u2019re likely to save a significant amount<\/a> on monthly utilities and maintenance<\/a> \u2014 that tiny house lifestyle is where the savings add up.<\/p>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section> While building a house for $20,000 might be a challenge, there are still ways to build a house for cheaper. These four builders figured out how to be innovative when building and saved a lot of money in the process:<\/p>\n Shannon Black built his first tiny home with only his own construction experience to guide him.<\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m originally from New Mexico and built three regular-sized homes while living there,\u201d he says. \u201cI moved to Washington when the tiny home movement<\/a> was just beginning and decided to build one.\u201d<\/p>\n Black chose to go with a wheeled home. He says the trailer for it was a big part of the budget, as he decided to use a trailer specifically made for tiny homes. Because the home was built on wheels, it was not subject to any required permits<\/a> or inspections.<\/p>\n He used primarily new materials except for the doors, which he purchased used, and also put in RV hookups for power, water, and sewer.<\/p>\n Black says there are certain building materials you shouldn\u2019t use in a wheeled tiny home, such as drywall, because it can crack when the home is being transported, but otherwise, much of the materials used are the same ones that would be part of any home build. \u201cI used regular windows and doors,\u201d he says. \u201cFor the most part, it had everything you\u2019d find in a larger home.\u201d<\/p>\n Black enjoyed the process so much, he decided to make a business out of it and started Big Freedom Tiny Homes<\/a> out of Bellingham. \u201cIt\u2019s a learning process,\u201d he says. \u201cI\u2019ve built 13 tiny homes so far, and with each one, I keep learning.\u201d<\/p>\n Gainesville, Florida, resident Troy Rosslow thought about building a home from a shipping container<\/a> for 15 years before he took the plunge. \u201cI\u2019d been involved in the building trade for about 25 years,\u201d he says. \u201cI worked in home improvement and contracting.\u201d After changing careers to become a licensed social worker, he maintained an interest in construction and building.<\/p>\n He decided to build a tiny container home in the backyard of his own residence, with the intention of using it as a rental<\/a>. His budget was originally $12,000, and Rosslow says the project came in at a total cost of about $16,000. \u201cWe had to do some improvements to our existing house in order to make it fit, had to clear some trees, and upgrade our existing electrical panels to be able to hook the container up to them,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n The home did not require any special permits, as it is considered a temporary portable structure and isn\u2019t attached to a foundation<\/a>. \u201cContainers are kind of unique in that way,\u201d he says. \u201cThey are already a structure and are structurally sound, so many of the permits and inspections<\/a> aren\u2019t required.\u201d<\/p>\n Rosslow says the biggest problem he found was the volume of air space within the home. \u201cWe had immediate problems with humidity because when you\u2019re in a tiny space like this, just breathing adds a lot of moisture to the air,\u201d he says. \u201cAnd containers are very tight \u2014 literally welded together \u2014 so I had to make some adjustments for that.\u201d<\/p>\n With the success of his first container home, Rosslow has gone on to teach workshops to other interested builders, and he has plans to build a full-size home made from shipping containers. \u201cMy family has outgrown our current home, and I realized that using containers to build a new home would be the most cost-effective, sustainable thing I could do,\u201d he says.<\/p>\n He estimates the cost of the new home, which will be approximately 3,000 square feet, to be about $150,000, not including land. \u201cThere\u2019s no way I could build a traditional home of that size for that price,\u201d he says. \u201cPlus, this is a labor of love, something I\u2019ve wanted to do forever.\u201d<\/p>\n In Alaska, it\u2019s still relatively easy to get away from it all and build in a remote area. For Doug Garrison and his wife, Jeanette, building an off-grid cabin was an affordable way to have a retirement home that they loved. The couple came to Alaska from Michigan in 1982, after a stint in the military introduced them to the state.<\/p>\n They started spending time on the island of Seldovia, located in Alaska\u2019s Kachemak Bay, and an opportunity came up to acquire land there. \u201cWe had friends that had a cabin on the island and we spent a lot of time there,\u201d says Doug. \u201cWhen we heard that there was a lot available<\/a>, I knew I wanted it.\u201d<\/p>\n Garrison realized that building might be a challenge. \u201cI had no building experience,\u201d he says. \u201cI did hire a contractor to do the framing, but I did everything else myself.\u201d<\/p>\n To top it off, Seldovia is only accessible by boat. The water-only access proved to be one of the most difficult aspects of the build, as getting materials over to the island was no easy task. \u201cI had 6,000 pounds of materials brought over by barge, and everything else I transported myself on my 18-foot skiff,\u201d says Garrison.<\/p>\n Their budget of $20,000 included the contractor for the framing, building materials, a heater, propane appliances, and most of the home\u2019s furnishings. \u201cThe biggest savings on the build was simply by doing it ourselves,\u201d he says. \u201cIf I didn\u2019t know how to do something, I researched or asked friends for advice. I even did the electrical<\/a> myself \u2014 and I\u2019m not an electrician.\u201d<\/p>\n The remote location also meant Garrison was able to avoid having to get any kind of special permits or inspections<\/a>, and while he initially got a generator for his electrical power, he has since gone solar. \u201cWe\u2019ve purchased two solar panels in the last five years,\u201d he says. \u201cIf I had it to do over, I\u2019d probably go 100% solar \u2014 it\u2019s that efficient.\u201d<\/p>\n His only other regret was trying to cut corners on things he shouldn\u2019t have, such as windows<\/a>. \u201cI initially bought used windows,\u201d he says. \u201cThey unfortunately didn\u2019t last, the seals started breaking and they were drafty \u2014 so I ended up buying new ones anyway.\u201d<\/p>\n Garrison says that building his cabin was a process, but was an affordable way to have a remote home that they could enjoy. \u201cI\u2019d advise anyone looking to build off-grid to ask lots of questions, and do as much work as you can yourself. It was a lot of work, but I also saved a lot of money.\u201d<\/p>\n Also, in Alaska, firefighter Ben Lewis decided that the only way he was going to get the home he really wanted was to build it himself. \u201cI started working as a carpenter when I was a senior in high school and was in the industry for 12 years before I got hired as a firefighter,\u201d he says. \u201cMy wife and I had talked about building our own place<\/a> for a long time, and I knew I could save by doing the bulk of the work myself.\u201d<\/p>\n Lewis started by seeking out the perfect lot, which took some time. \u201cI found one lot I really liked, and I decided to get the soil tested before I bought it. I hired an engineer to run soil samples, which was kind of expensive, but it saved me money in the long run because, as it turned out, the soil wasn\u2019t good for building,\u201d he says. Lewis and his wife ended up finding their lot just outside the city of Anchorage.<\/p>\n Lewis did the footings, foundation<\/a>, and framing himself, as well as all the interior trim work and some of the flooring. \u201cJust on the framing alone, I saved at least $40,000,\u201d he says. \u201cWe got a bid for framing when we started that came in at $50,000, and I did it myself for about $10,000.\u201d<\/p>\n He did hire an architect to create the plans, as well as subcontract some of the more specialized work, like electrical and plumbing.<\/p>\n The proposed budget for the build was about $125 to $150 per square foot. Lewis says they went a bit over that \u2014 mainly because he wanted a high-quality, energy-efficient home. \u201cI think we ended up spending closer to $175 per square foot, but that included things like in-floor heating and triple-pane windows,\u201d explains Lewis. \u201cIf I\u2019d hired someone else to build the home, there is no way I could\u2019ve afforded those extras.\u201d The finished home is right at 2,800 square feet.<\/p>\n Lewis recommends that anyone looking to build their own home should take their time and research the process. \u201cWe took about a year to plan our build, and the construction took about 14 months,\u201d he says. \u201cYou should always have a buffer with your budget because costs inevitably end up being higher than you think.\u201d<\/p>\n For Lewis, the satisfaction outweighs any of the difficulties that building your own home<\/a> can bring. \u201cI live in a house I built myself,\u201d he says. \u201cThat\u2019s the reward.\u201d<\/p>\n \n\n\n\n\nTiny homes<\/h3>\n
Estimated cost range: $30,000 to $100,000<\/h4>\n
Shipping container homes<\/h3>\n
Estimated cost range: $25,000 to $80,000 for a single-container home<\/h4>\n
Modular homes<\/h3>\n
Estimated cost range: $120,000 to $270,000<\/h4>\n
Barndominiums<\/h3>\n
Estimated cost range: $112,800 to $540,000<\/h4>\n
Prefab kits<\/h3>\n
Estimated cost range: $50,000 to $500,000<\/h4>\n
\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
Hire a contractor or DIY?<\/h2>\n
How to save money when building<\/h2>\n
But what about those ultra-cheap builds that we\u2019ve seen on TV?<\/h2>\n
\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
How others did it: 4 case studies<\/h2>\n
Case study #1: Going tiny<\/h3>\n
Total cost: $30,000<\/h4>\n
Case study #2: The shipping container home<\/h3>\n
Total cost: $16,000 for tiny home; $150,000 for full-size home<\/h4>\n<\/div><\/div><\/div><\/section>
\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/div>\n\t\t\t
Case study #3: Off-the-grid home<\/h3>\n
Total cost: $20,000<\/h4>\n
Case study #4: The owner-contractor build<\/h3>\n
Total cost: $350,000<\/h4>\n